Skip to main content
Download PDF

Enhancing knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to dental caries in mothers and caregivers of children through a neuroeducational strategy

BMC Oral Health volume 24, Article number: 60 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to oral health among parents play a crucial role in shaping oral hygiene and preventing early childhood caries. This study was intended to determine the effect of a neuroeducational strategy in improving knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to early childhood caries among mothers or caregivers of children.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study was conducted, implementing an educational strategy involving 33 mothers or female caregivers of children who met specific selection criteria. The strategy consisted of three key elements derived from neuroeducation: (1) experiment, (2) surprise and play, and (3) learn. Based on the participants’ attendance at the sessions, they were categorized into two groups: those who underwent in-person intervention (G1) and those who received a combined in-person and virtual intervention (G2). The impact of the strategy was evaluated by comparing the participants’ knowledge and attitudes, as well as their children’s plaque index, before and after the intervention (immediate and 6-month impact).

Results

The participants exhibited a favorable and statistically significant effect on the median number of correct answers related to knowledge (G1 immediate effect (IE): p = 0.03, 6-month effect (ME): p = 0.002; G2 IE p = 0.002, ME: p = 0.001), and in the children’s plaque index (G1 IE: p = 0.003, ME: p = 0.003; G2 IE: p = 0.033, ME: p = 0.003). Furthermore, there was an increase in the number of participants with a high level of knowledge (G1 IE: 41.5%; ME: 75%; G2 IE: 45.5%, ME: 42.9%), and of children with a good level of oral hygiene (G1 IE: 50%; ME: 73.0%; G2 IE: 27.3%, ME: 84.6%). Finally, qualitative interviews revealed a lasting clarity in concepts and sustained knowledge and attitudes at the six-month mark. However, a slightly diminished understanding of the relationship between bacteria, sugar, and caries was observed in G2 group, and some loss of association in the G1 group, at six months.

Conclusion

The implementation of this strategy resulted in significant and lasting impacts on knowledge, attitudes, and practices, especially in the G1 group. Nevertheless, there is a need for further reinforcement of the association between bacteria, sugar, and caries.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Dental caries is one of the most widespread noncommunicable diseases worldwide and a matter of public health concern [1, 2]. When present in children under six years of age, it is termed early childhood caries (ECC), characterized by the presence of one or more decayed (non-cavitated or cavitated lesions), missing (due to caries), or filled tooth surfaces on any primary tooth [3]. Untreated caries poses risks to the development of permanent teeth, leading to pain, discomfort, and if it reaches the dental pulp, potential infection, tooth loss, and even systemic diseases. Furthermore, it can have a significant social and economic impact [4].

The disruption of the balance within the oral microbiota present in biofilm is the primary cause of dental caries, mainly due to the prevalence of cariogenic bacteria. These bacteria produce organic acids, which lead to the demineralization of tooth enamel [5, 6]. Various factors contribute to this imbalance, including a high and frequent intake of fermentable carbohydrates such as common sugar (sucrose), and inadequate oral hygiene practices that promote biofilm formation. Consequently, cariogenic bacteria accumulate and metabolize on the teeth [5, 7]. Other predisposing factors for this condition encompass low saliva production, immunological alterations, and even socioeconomic risk factors such as education, income, oral health knowledge, and attitudes among others [8,9,10].

In Colombia, the prevalence of caries was observed to be 5.89% in one-year-old children, 43.8% in three-year-old children, and 52.2% in five-year-old children. This study also highlights a delayed attendance to dental consultation, where only 58.9% of children under five years of age having been taken for such consultation. Regarding the children’s oral hygiene routines, 15.4% of caregivers indicated that the child performed their hygiene independently, while 39.6% shared the responsibility with the child. Moreover, 74.2% of caregivers had not been provided with guidance on the correct application of toothpaste, and 78.2% had not received instructions on the appropriate amount to use [11].

To address the aforementioned statistics, Colombia has launched the “Soy Generación más Sonriente” (I Am the Smiling Generation) program. Under this initiative, various stakeholders, including local authorities, healthcare institutions, healthcare professionals, academic and research organizations, among others, are involved in educating the population. During dental check-ups and health campaigns, healthcare institutions administer fluoride varnish to individuals under 18 years of age, along with other interventions as outlined in the Comprehensive Health Care Routes [12]. Besides the program, individual interventions are carried out by entities within the general social security healthcare system, particularly focusing on early childhood, childhood and adolescence. These interventions include comprehensive assessments conducted annually, specific protection through fluoride varnish application, prophylaxis, and dental biofilm removal every six months, sealant application as recommended by dentists, and finally, individual, family, and group education [13].

Studies conducted in various countries have shown a significant association between parents’ or caregivers’ limited knowledge about oral health and ECC, highlighting the need for educational initiatives to promote oral health [14,15,16]. Education is one of social determinant of health since it imparts accurate and reliable knowledge that encourages healthy behaviors and enables the recognition of symptoms related to diseases [17]. Educating people about the causes of dental caries is particularly important, as it helps individuals better comprehend the recommended preventive measures [18]. For example, these preventive initiatives may include efforts to reduce sugar consumption, regular exposure to fluoride and monitoring its levels, initiating and supervising tooth brushing at an early age, understanding the health-disease process, attending dental check-ups, and adopting health-promoting oral hygiene behaviors [18].

Effective educational strategies that lead to long-lasting learning are essential for improving knowledge and attitudes related to oral health [19, 20]. However, acquiring knowledge about oral health doesn’t always translate into a strong sense of self-efficacy or the adoption of healthy behaviors [21]. As a result, it is necessary to develop strategies based on neuroscience, as this discipline has improved the understanding of the relationship between learning, human cognition, and behavior, thus contributing to neuroeducation [22]. Neuroeducation is an interdisciplinary research field that leverages insights from neuroscience to understand brain function, incorporates principles from psychology to study cognition and human behavior, and applies pedagogical practices to enhance education [23,24,25]. This interdisciplinary field promotes teaching strategies that involve active participation and integrate elements that optimize information processing, and improve concentration [26].

Among the elements of neuroeducation, “experience” involves stimuli such as sensory stimulation, and simple or complex motor actions. This, in turn, allows for brain reactions and neuronal changes [22]. Another element is “emotions” where the cognitive experience constitutes the sensation. Emotions and feelings play a significant role in consolidating learned contents more efficiently and are responsible for spontaneous reactions and thought processes. They also contribute to decision-making [25, 27]. As part of the emotions, experimentation and play serve as didactic resources that stimulate curiosity and motivation for learning. Experimentation promotes the interpretation, reasoning, and cognitive skills related to a particular subject, while play facilitates the transmission of information and enhances working memory [28, 29].

Neuroeducation has enabled the development of interventions, particularly aimed at students, to enhance information processing, attention, and concentration [30, 31]. When it comes to community-based education aimed at improving knowledge, attitudes, and/or practices, studies have reported strategies based on neuropsychology, cognitive neuroscience, or behavioral sciences [32,33,34]. Recognizing the importance of incorporating certain elements of neuroeducation to enhance the learning processes, a strategy was devised and implemented to explain the etiology of caries and caries prevention measures. This study aimed to determine the effect of a neuroeducational approach on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to preventing childhood caries among mothers and caregivers of children aged one to five years.

Materials and methods

Study design and study population

This study was approved by the ethics subcommittee at Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (No. 55.2019). A quasi-experimental study with a before-and-after design and without a control group was conducted from February to October 2022. This research was conducted at an official public kindergarten catering to children aged 1 to 5, primarily from low to middle- income backgrounds in the city of Villavicencio, Colombia (“Sueños de aprender” [“Dreams of Learning”] kindergarten).

The study sample consisted of 33 participants, which corresponded to a power of 99.9%, indicating a low probability of a type II error in the statistical analysis of the results. This information was calculated using the Epidat 3.1 program (Xunta de Galicia/OPS-OMS), taking into account an expected related mean difference for the plaque index of 1.37, and a standard deviation of 0.39 (before the intervention) and 0.29 (after) [35], with a confidence level of 95%. Participants were included based on the following criteria being consistently met throughout the study: (1) Providing voluntary written consent. (2) Being mothers or female caregivers as the strategy included an activity intended to stimulate maternal sensitivity 3) Being mothers or female caregivers of systemically healthy children (aged one to five years). (4) Not having any intellectual or cognitive disability. (5) Being committed to participating in the strategy activities.

Study phases

The study encompassed 6 phases: (1) Invitation to participate and signing of informed consent; (2) Data collection from participants and their children via cell phone call (sociodemographic variables, clinical history and oral health knowledge, attitude and practices). Before data collection, interviewer standardization was conducted; (3) Clinical oral examination of children and explanation to caregivers about the “Lift the Lips” technique, which allows for the identification of early signs of caries lesions [36]; (4) Implementation of the educational strategy; (5) Assessment of immediate impact: participants were interviewed via phone call, and clinical examinations of the children were performed (fifteen days after strategy implementation); (6). Measurement of knowledge retention: participants were interviewed via phone call, and clinical examinations of the children was conducted (six months after strategy implementation).

Educational strategy implemented

The present strategy was designed by researchers in the areas of oral microbiology (MPAD), dentistry (CCA), education (ELDA), and neuropsychology (DVA). The strategy was previously implemented in a pilot study [37], allowing for improving the data collection and intervention in this study. The strategy encompassed moments based on experiences that stimulate different emotions. For this purpose, two meetings were held. The first meeting was held in person for all participants, and the second meeting conducted in person or virtually, depending on attendance. The virtual intervention was carried out using the instant messaging application for cell phones (WhatsApp®). As a result, two groups were formed: the completely face-to-face intervention group (G1) and the mixed face-to-face-virtual intervention group (G2). The learning moments were three: (1) Experience, where efforts were made to induce feelings of motherhood, love, and protection (using sensitizing phrases and aromas) to enhance attention during the viewing of an animated story (video) and experimentation in a simulated microbiology laboratory. (2) Surprise and play, which sought to encourage interpretation and reasoning through the observation of experiment results and involved a game played in person to stimulate attention and concentration before the final moment (only for the G1 group). (3) Learn, which provided instructions on healthy habits [24, 26] (Table 1). The children were consistently present during the intervention.

Table 1 Neuroeducational strategy implemented
Full size table

Measuring the impact of the educational strategy on participants

Before and after implementing the strategy, data was collected on sociodemographic variables and the children’s clinical history. A validated questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.82) [38], was also administered to measure the oral health knowledge of parents/caregivers of young children. This instrument consists of 25 questions arranged in 63 items. The topics are associated with (1) dental caries (causes, appearance of initial lesions, how to prevent it), (2) tooth brushing (main purpose), (3) baby teeth (importance and care, information received, age of eruption and onset of oral hygiene), (4) toothpaste (importance, age of initial use, control of quantity), and (5) fluoride (function, knowledge of the presence of systemic fluoride in Colombia). The questionnaire categorized knowledge levels based on the number of correct answers as follows: Scarce (0–25 points), Acceptable (26–50 points), and Good (51–75 points). Additionally, open-ended questions on oral health (knowledge, attitudes and practices) were included (Additional file 1: Appendix A1), and the responses were recorded in audio format. The open-ended questions and the interviewers were calibrated in accordance with the pilot study [37].

Furthermore, the children underwent oral examinations using the knee-to-knee technique [39] using a World Health Organization dental probe, a dental mirror, and artificial light to determine the state of the soft and hard tissues. Oral hygiene was measured using the “modified Silness and Löe” dental plaque index. The percentage of dental plaque was determined based on the number of dental surfaces with plaque, and the level of oral hygiene was classified by the percentage of plaque as Poor (31–100%), Fair (16–30%), Good (0–15%) [40].

Data analysis

Quantitative data analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). This involved an examination of sociodemographic data and the calculation of the frequencies of participants’ knowledge levels and the plaque index levels of the children. In addition, descriptive analyses (were performed on continuous data variables including the calculation of mean, median, mode, standard deviation, and variance, among others. The statistical normality of the data was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk test, while the homogeneity of variances was determined using Levene’s test. Comparative analyses of the of the knowledge scores and the percentages of the dental plaque index was conducted using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test due to the non-normal distribution of the data. A significance level of 5% was used for all statistical tests.

The qualitative data analysis was conducted by the researchers. A verbatim transcription of the interviews collected both before and after the strategy was created and reviewed by the CCA. The text was read and re-read, analyzed, and discussed following inductive thematic analysis, where the information was coded manually by MPAD, and reviewed by ELDA. The participants’ expressions in sentences and lines were summarized. Next, categories and subcategories were developed by identifying patterns in the data and merging similar codes. Finally, relevant quotes were extracted to illustrate each subcategory. The transcription data collected after of strategy, was analyzed using the same categories and subcategories to detect changes in the participants.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of participants and dental history of their children

Most of the participants in the study were mothers within families who had planned pregnancies and were in the adult life cycle. In G1, the majority of participants had completed high school and a similar percentage had finished university. In G2, most participants had technical degrees.

In both groups, the majority of the children were female and five years old (Table 2), and most had visited the dentist and received treatment with prophylaxis and fluoride application being the most common treatments. In terms of habits, most children brushed their teeth twice a day, and consumed sweets or carbohydrates one to three times a day (Additional file 2: Appendix 2). It’s worth noting that half of the children had dental caries.

Table 2 Characteristics of the study population
Full size table

Effect of the strategy on oral health knowledge

Immediately and 6 months after the implementation of the educational strategy, there was an increase in the percentage of participants who achieved a good level of knowledge, particularly in the G1 group (Before: G1: 0%, G2: 0%; After: G1 immediate effect (IE): 41.5%; G1 6-month effect (ME): 75%; G2 IE: 45.5%, G2 ME: 42.9%) (Fig. 1). This particularly was also detected in the median of correct answers, with a significant improvement in the immediate impact in G1 group (before: 43.0 interquartile range [IQR] [41.3–44.8], after: 48.0 IQR [45.3–52.8], p = 0.03) and in G2 group (before: 42.5 IQR [40.0–45.0], after: 47.8 IQR [42.5–53.3], p = 0.002) (Fig. 1, Additional file 3: Appendix 3). In terms of the 6-month impact, a significant increase in the median of correct answers was observed again in both the G1 (before: 43.0 IQR [41.3–44.8], after 52.0 IQR [47.3–54.8], p = 0.002); and G2 groups (before: 43.0 IQR [40.0–45.0], after: 49.0 IQR [45.0–53.0], p = 0.001) (Fig. 1, Additional file 3: Appendix 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Impact of the strategy on level of knowledge.  Immediate impact (a, b) Knowledge level of participants in G1 and G2 groups. Level of knowledge about oral health: Scarce level: 0–25 correct answers. Acceptable level: 26–50 correct answers. Good level: 51–75 correct answers. c, d Score of correct answers in G1 and G2 groups. Wilcoxon test. *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01. Six months post-intervention. e, f Level knowledge of participants in G1 and G2 groups. g, h Score of correct answers in G1 and G2 groups

Full size image

Effect of the strategy on oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Qualitative analysis

The educational strategy had an immediate and favorable impact, especially in the G1 group, across various categories, including understanding the etiology of caries (recognizing the presence of bacteria as the cause of the disease and its relationship with inadequate hygiene and dietary habits), early caries detection (identifying white spot as the first sign of the disease), dental visits (emphasizing early visit), responsibility of the person who brushes the teeth (strengthening the commitment to oral health), tooth brushing (promoting the use of a small amount of toothpaste) and emotions (resulting in an increase in positive emotions) (Table 3).

Table 3 Categories, subcategories and quotes regarding knowledge, attitudes, and practices before and after the strategy
Full size table

Six months after the implementation of the educational strategy, the G1 group showed a lasting retention of information in the categories related to the etiology of caries, the responsibility of the person who brushes the teeth, tooth brushing and positive emotions. However, in the category of early caries detection, it was observed that participants in the G2 group and some in the G1 group had forgotten this concept (Table 3).

In the category related to the effect of sweetness on caries, it was found that the effect was somewhat lower compared to the other categories. Few participants were able to associate the effect of sugar with the increase of cariogenic bacteria and its role in causing caries. Finally, in the category of actions that prevent the appearance of caries, it was detected that most participants knew about this topic before the intervention, and there were not many significant changes in their understanding (Table 3).

Effect of the strategy on children’s plaque rate

Immediately after the intervention and at the 6-month follow-up, an increase in the percentage of children with a good level of oral hygiene was detected in G1 group (before IE: 8.3%, after IE: 50%; before ME: 0%, after ME: 73%) and G2 group (before IE: 4.5%, after IE: 27.3%; before ME: 0%, after ME 84.6%) (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the immediate impact of the strategy resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of the plaque index in G1 (before: 31.5% IQR [14.7–31.5], after: 16.5% IQR [6.0–16.5], p = 0.003) and G2 (before: 36.0% IQR [26.3–43.5], after: 24.0% IQR [14.3–36.8], p = 0.033) (Fig. 2). The 6-month impact also showed a significant decrease in G1 (before: 33.0 IQR [27.0–61.0], after: 9.0 IQR [6.0–18.0], p = 0.003) and G2 (before: 36.0 IQR [30.0–47.0], after: 9.0 IQR [4.5–15.0], p = 0.003) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Impact of the strategy on dental plaque index of children’s plaque rate. Immediate impact (a, b) Level of oral hygiene in G1 and G2 groups. Level of oral hygiene: Poor 31–100%, Fair 16–30%, Good 0–15%. c, d Percentage of dental plaque in G1 and G2 groups. Wilcoxon test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Six months post-intervention. e, f Level of oral hygiene in G1 and G2 groups. g, h Percentage of dental plaque in G1 and G2 groups

Full size image

Discussion

Before implementing the strategy, it was observed that all participants had an average level of knowledge about oral health, with the majority being unaware of the etiology of caries and exhibiting significant misconceptions in key concepts about oral health (early signs of caries, first visit and frequency of dental visits, amount of toothpaste, and responsible individuals for brushing teeth). Additionally, the majority of the children had poor oral hygiene, and half of them had early childhood caries. These findings highlight a persistent lack of oral health knowledge in the population, as well as insufficient educational and communication actions that really impact and promote healthy practices. This aligns with reports from the latest ENSAB and other studies carried out in Colombia [11, 12, 41].

The strategy implemented in both the G1 and G2 groups had a positive impact on the knowledge and attitudes of participants, and on the oral hygiene index of their children. The learning achieved in this study could have been influenced by the stimulation of positive emotions and feelings, which play a role in cognitive processes such as attention, memory, motivation, perception, and decision-making [22].

The stimulation of maternal sensitivity, was a crucial element of the activity. In addition to improving knowledge, it also led to a reduction of threatening phrases related to oral care and increased the children’s interest in brushing and oral examinations. This finding confirms what has been demonstrated in other studies regarding the impact of positive parental attitudes on children’s oral health and self-care [42, 43]. For example, a study by Nepaul and Mahomed in 2020 found an association between parental knowledge and positive attitudes, which translated into children displaying happier attitudes toward tooth and tongue brushing [42].

The experimental component of the strategy, which included demonstrating the presence of bacteria on the teeth and the effect of toothpaste in reducing them, played a significant role in the positive results, especially in reducing dental biofilm in children. Several studies have reported the impact of demonstrating the presence of dental biofilm and bacteria in the oral cavity on the oral hygiene practices of participants or their children [35, 44]. For example, a study by Thomson et al. in 2022 showed that implementing oral hygiene instructions along with microbiological explanations and demonstrations increased adherence to hygiene practices and improved understanding of the relationship between oral bacteria and dental disease among pregnant patients [44].

The play component, which aimed to engage participants’ attention and motivation before the learning moment, may have contributed to the face-to-face group’s (G1) higher level of knowledge. This result is likely because play stimulates the production of dopamine, increasing curiosity, attention, and motivation to learn, and enhances the transmission of information between the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex [45]. Play has been used in different studies, especially with children, to improve knowledge about oral health and hygiene [46, 47]. For instance, a study by Sharma et al. in 2021, which involved a game combined with didactic cards, showed a more significant impact on the oral hygiene index compared to a conventional strategy, in children aged seven and 12 years [47]. However, it is essential to note that G1 has more participants with a professional background compared to the G2 group, which might have also facilitated greater learning.

In our study, we observed not only the immediate impact but also a good retention and even improvement in participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices, as well as in the oral hygiene of the children, six months after the intervention. This sustained and enhanced effect has been demonstrated in interventions with psychoeducational characteristics. These interventions do not only enhance knowledge, but also positively influence behavioral intentions, which “are predictors of behavior and are determined by the individual’s attitude and normative social forces to perform the behavior” [32, 33]. For example, a study based on the self-determination theory achieved significantly greater persistence in dietary behaviors, oral hygiene, and avoidance of sharing eating utensils with their children among mothers of one to four-year-old children, compared to a control group [33, 34]. Another strategy based on the theory of planned behavior, led to a significant increase in oral self-care in mothers of children between one and six years of age, both immediately, and at three and six months post-implementation, compared to a control group. In addition, at the six-month follow up, there was a significant increase in the number of children brushing their teeth twice daily [34].

Although the positive outcomes were observed immediately and at the six-month follow-up, there was notably a lower understanding of the white spot as the first sign of caries, and a weaker connection between the presence of bacteria, high sugar consumption, and the development of caries primarily within the mixed intervention group (G2). These results highlight the importance of the components used in fully face-to-face participation, such as the play. Nonetheless, after 6 months, the results for G1 and G2 in terms of the oral hygiene index were similar, with G2 even having one more member with good hygiene. These findings underscore the significance of the activities carried out on the first day, including maternal sensitivity, clinical examinations of the children, and the experimentation process in a simulated laboratory.

One of the limitations of the present study was the reduced number of participants in the group that underwent the face-to-face intervention due to lower attendance during the second meeting. Another limitation was related to the participants’ limited availability of time, which hindered the assessment of maternal oral health status and the collection of data in person. However, in order to mitigate potential biases during the phone calls, we established an information collection protocol and standardized the process. A limitation in terms of the qualitative analysis was that there was no external researcher involved in handling the information, which, if there had been, could have reduced confirmation bias.

In addition, this study did not include a long-term follow-up to assess the oral hygiene and caries status of the children due to the loss of the population, as many children changed educational institutions. Therefore, it is recommended that this educational strategy be implemented in a larger population that allows for long-term follow-up.

Finally, after 6 months, some participants exhibited a loss of knowledge regarding the early sign of caries and the microbiological link between sugar consumption and dental caries. This highlights the need to incorporate an experimental reinforce these critical concepts within the strategy.

Conclusions

The implementation of a strategy rooted in neuroeducation elements, including emotions, experimentation, and play, yielded highly beneficial outcomes for the participants. These benefits were evident in terms of the enhanced knowledge and scores related to oral health, better comprehension of caries etiology, improved attitudes toward oral care and oral hygiene for children. Nevertheless, further efforts are required to reinforce the understanding of the connection between bacteria, sugar, and dental caries.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Peres MA, Macpherson LMD, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, et al. Oral Diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394(10194):249–60. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31146-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Uribe SE, Innes N, Maldupa I. The global prevalence of early childhood caries: a systematic review with meta-analysis using the WHO diagnostic criteria. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021;31(6):817–30. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/ipd.12783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drury TF, Horowitz AM, Ismail AI, Maertens MP, Rozier RG, Selwitz RH. Diagnosing and reporting early childhood caries for research purposes. A report of a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the Health Care Financing Administration. J Public Health Dent. 1999;59(3):192–97. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1999.tb03268.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dye BA. The global burden of oral Disease: research and public health significance. J Dent Res. 2017;96(4):361–63. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0022034517693567.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Marsh PD. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and Disease. Adv Dent Res. 1994;8(2):263–71. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0895937494008002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Featherstone JD. Dental caries: a dynamic Disease process. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(3):286–91. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00064.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giacaman RA, Fernández CE, Muñoz-Sandoval C, León S, García-Manríquez N, Echeverría C, Valdés S, Castro RJ, Gambetta-Tessini K. Understanding dental caries as a non-communicable and behavioral Disease: management implications. Front Oral Health. 2022;3:764479. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/froh.2022.764479.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwendicke F, Dorfer CE, Schlattmann P, Foster Page L, Thomson WM, Paris S. Socioeconomic inequality and caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015;94(1):10–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0022034514557546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bencze Z, Mahrouseh N, Andrade CAS, Kovács N, Varga O. The burden of early childhood caries in children under 5 years old in the European Union and associated risk factors: an ecological study. Nutrients. 2021;13(2):455. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13020455.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Butera A, Maiorani C, Morandini A, Simonini M, Morittu S, Trombini J, Scribante A. Evaluation of children caries risk factors: a narrative review of nutritional aspects, oral hygiene habits, and bacterial alterations. Child (Basel). 2022;9(2):262. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children9020262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 2014. Ministry of Health of Colombia, IV National Oral Health Sttudy ENSAB IV, Bogotá. Minsalud. 2014. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/ENSAB-IV-Situacion-Bucal-Actual.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2022.

  12. Ministry of Health of Colombia. 2021. Lineamientos estrategia incremental de cuidado y protección específica en salud bucal para la primera infancia, infancia y adolescencia “Soy Generación más Sonriente”. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/ENT/lineamientos-soy-generacion-sonriente.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2022.

  13. Ministry of Health of Colombia. Resolución 3280. BOGOTÁ: MINSALUD. 2018. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/resolucion-3280-de-2018.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2023.

  14. Wulaerhan J, Abudureyimu A, Bao XL, Zhao J. Risk determinants associated with early childhood caries in Uygur children: a preschool-based cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:136. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1472-6831-14-136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chawłowska E, Karasiewicz M, Lipiak A, Cofta M, Fechner B, Lewicka-Rabska A, Pruciak A, Gerreth K. Exploring the relationships between children’s oral health and parents’ oral health knowledge, literacy, behaviours and adherence to recommendations: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(18):11288. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph191811288.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kimmie-Dhansay F, Barrie R, Roberts T, Naidoo S. Maternal and infant risk factors and risk indicators associated with early childhood caries in South Africa: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):183. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12903-022-02218-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sociedad española de odontopediatría. Técnica de levantar labio. España: SEOP. 2019.https://0-archpublichealth-biomedcentral-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/articles/10.1186/s13690-020-00402-5. Accessed 28 Oct 2023.

  18. Sampaio FC, Bönecker M, Paiva SM, Martignon S, Ricomini Filho AP, Pozos-Guillen A, Oliveira BH, Bullen M, Naidu R, Guarnizo-Herreño C, Gomez J, Malheiros Z, Stewart B, Ryan M, Pitts N. Dental caries prevalence, prospects, and challenges for Latin America and Caribbean countries: a summary and final recommendations from a Regional Consensus. Braz Oral Res. 2021;35(1):e056. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hogh A, Müller-Hilke B. Learning strategies and their correlation with academic success in biology and physiology examinations during the preclinical years of medical school. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(1):e0245851. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0245851.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng S, Zhao L, Ju N, Hua T, Zhang S, Liao S. Relationship between oral health-related knowledge, attitudes, practice, self-rated oral health and oral health-related quality of life among Chinese college students: a structural equation modeling approach. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):99. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12903-021-01419-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Marquillier T, Trentesaux T, Pierache A, Delfosse C, Lombrail P, Azogui-Levy S. Which determinants should be considered to reduce social inequalities in paediatric dental care access? A cross-sectional study in France. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0255360. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0255360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jolles J, Jolles DD. On neuroeducation: why and how to improve neuroscientific literacy in educational professionals. Front Psychol. 2021;12:752151. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.752151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Howard-Jones PA. A multiperspective approach to neuroeducational research. Educ Philos Theory. 2011;43(1):24–30. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00703.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nouri A. The basic principles of research in neuroeducation studies. IJCRSEE. 2016;4(1):59–66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.5937/IJCRSEE1601059N.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amran MS, Bakar AYA. We feel, therefore we memorize: understanding emotions in learning mathematics using neuroscience research perspectives. Univers J Educ. 2020;8:5943–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruiz-Mejías M, Pérez N, Carrió-Llach M. Knowledge of neuroscience boosts motivation and awareness of learning strategies in science vocational education students. JONED. 2021;1(2):30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tyng CM, Amin HU, Saad MNM, Malik AS. The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1454. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sánchez-Rodríguez KR, Ulloa-Vargas KV. Análisis Del experimento como recurso didáctico en talleres de ciencias: El Caso Del Museo De Los niños de Costa Rica. Rev Actual Investig educ. 2009;9(1):1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kontra C, Goldin-Meadow S, Beilock SL. Embodied learning across the life span. Top Cogn Sci. 2012;4(4):731–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01221.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson SJ, Hecker KG, Krigolson OE, Jamniczky HA. A reinforcement-based learning paradigm increases anatomical learning and retention-a neuroeducation study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:38. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00038.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Babinski LM, Murray DW, Wilson WA, Kuhn CM, Malone PS. Impact of a neuroscience-based health education course on high school students’ health knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors. J Adolesc Health. 2018;63(4):489–96. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.05.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ismail AI, Ondersma S, Jedele JM, Little RJ, Lepkowski JM. Evaluation of a brief tailored motivational intervention to prevent early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011;39(5):433–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Weber-Gasparoni K, Reeve J, Ghosheh N, Warren JJ, Drake DR, Kramer KW, Dawson DV. An effective psychoeducational intervention for early childhood caries prevention: part I. Pediatr Dent. 2013a;35(3):241–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Weber-Gasparoni K, Warren JJ, Reeve J, Drake DR, Kramer KW, Marshall TA, Dawson DV. An effective psychoeducational intervention for early childhood caries prevention: part II. Pediatr Dent. 2013b;35(3):247–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Muñoz WE, Mattos MA. Técnica educativa para mejorar Los conocimientos de salud oral de madres y reducir El índice de higiene oral de preescolares. Int J Odontostomat. 2015;9(2):321–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nicolae A, Levin L, Wong PD, Dave MG, Taras J, Mistry C, Ford-Jones EL, Wong M, Schroth RJ. Identification of early childhood caries in primary care settings. Paediatr Child Health. 2018;23(2):111–15. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/pch/pxx155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Guzman-Vergara MD, Ramos-Perez YA, Suarez-Salinas LT, Vigoya-Valderrama YP, Angarita-Díaz MP, Durán-Arismendy, Cabrera-Arango CL, Vásquez-Aldana DA. Efecto De una estrategia neuroeducativa basada en El entendimiento de la etiologia de la caries en madres de niños de 1 a 5 años-prueba piloto-. Villavicencio: Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Martignon S, Bautista-Mendoza G, González-Carrera MC, et al. Instruments for evaluating oral health knowledge, attitudes and practice for parents/caregivers of small children. Rev Salud pública. 2008;10:308–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fux N, Shmueli A, Halperson E, Ram D, Moskovitz M. Knee-To-Knee position for minor procedures in infants and toddlers-dentists attitudes. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;43(2):86–90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.17796/1053-4625-43.2.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Martignon S, González MC, Ruiz JA, McCormick V. Guía De práctica clínica para El diagnóstico, prevención y tratamiento de la caries dental. Bogotá: Secretaría distrital de salud; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sánchez-Peña MK, Galvis-Aricapa JA, Álzate-Urrea S, Lema-Agudelo D, Lobón-Córdoba LM, Quintero-García Y, Carmona-Medina SL. Conocimientos y prácticas de las agentes educativas y condiciones de salud bucal de niños del municipio de Santa Rosa de Cabal, Colombia. Univ Salud. 2019;21(1):27–37. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.22267/rus.192101.137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nepaul P, Mahomed O. Influence of parents’ oral health knowledge and attitudes on oral health practices of children (5–12 Years) in a rural school in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020;10(5):605–12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_273_20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Vanagas G, Milasauskiene Z, Grabauskas V, Mickeviciene A. Associations between parental skills and their attitudes toward importance to develop good oral hygiene skills in their children. Med (Kaunas). 2009;45(9):718–23.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thomson JJ, Relich EE, Girdwood JR, Byrappagari D. Microbiology-based instruction during prenatal dental visits improves perinatal oral health literacy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):2633. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph19052633.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang S, Aamodt S. Play, stress, and the learning brain. Cerebrum. 2012;2012:12.

  46. Kumar Y, Asokan S, John B, Gopalan T. Effect of conventional and game-based teaching on oral health status of children: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8(2):123–26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Sharma S, Saxena S, Naik SN, Bhandari R, Shukla AK, Gupta P. Comparison between conventional, game-based, and self-made storybook-based oral health education on children’s oral hygiene status: a prospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(2):273–77. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1811.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the kindergarten principal for their contribution during the study (“Sueños de aprender”), and all participants of the face-to-face intervention for their commitment.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (INV2819) and Dirección Científica, Centro de Competencias Cognitivas y Afectivas (21-10-2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GIOMET Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia – Campus of Villavicencio, Carrera 35 # 36 99, Villavicencio, Colombia

    María del Pilar Angarita-Díaz, Elsa Durán-Arismendy, Claudia Cabrera-Arango, Valentina Bautista-Parra, Jessica Laguna-Moreno & Winnifer Mondragón-López

  2. Scientific Direction. Centro de Competencias Cognitivas y Afectivas, Villavicencio, Colombia

    Daniel Vásquez-Aldana

Authors
  1. María del Pilar Angarita-Díaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elsa Durán-Arismendy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claudia Cabrera-Arango
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Vásquez-Aldana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Valentina Bautista-Parra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jessica Laguna-Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Winnifer Mondragón-López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MPAD, ELDA, DVA, CCA conceived of the presented idea, contributed in experiments in Villavicencio and wrote the manuscript, VBP, JLM, WML carried out the experiments in Villavicencio. All authors provided critical feedback in the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María del Pilar Angarita-Díaz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics subcommittee of Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (No. 55.2019). Informed consent was obtained from all the parents/guardians of individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Appendix 1.

Telephone interview guide for the study.

Additional file 2: Appendix A2.

Dental history of the children of the participating mothers or caregivers.

Additional file 3: Appendix A3.

Distribution of participants’ answers about oral health knowledge.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angarita-Díaz, M.d.P., Durán-Arismendy, E., Cabrera-Arango, C. et al. Enhancing knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to dental caries in mothers and caregivers of children through a neuroeducational strategy. BMC Oral Health 24, 60 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12903-023-03734-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12903-023-03734-0

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us