Table 1 Tabulated Results showing the Author, Year of Study, Number of Individuals Examined, Age Group, and Enamel Defects Measurement
Author | Type of Study | Study Population | Age Group(years) | DDE Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jagels&Sweeney 1976 | Case-control study | Case 63 Control 56 | 5–12 | % of subjects showing enamel hypoplasia |
Primosch 1980 | Cross-sectional observational study | Case 86 Control 86 | 3.3–24.2 | % of DDE in permanent teeth |
Narang 2003 | Case-control study | Case 74 Control 106 | Case 2.5–16.5 Control 3.0– 16.5 | % of opacities in primary teeth % of opacities in permanent teeth |
Azevedo 2006 | Case-control study | Case 13 Control 13 | Mean age 10.3 | % of permanent teeth affected according to DDE type |
Ferrazzano 2009 | Case-control study | Case 54 Control 101 | 7–12 | % of subjects with DDE |
Ferrazzano 2012 | Case-control study | Case 88 Control 101 | 4–12 | Prevalence of DDE present (%) |
Peker 2014 | Case-control study | Case 30 Control 30 | Case 10.2 ± 4.8 Control 9.9 ± 1.4 | % of subjects with mild DDE, moderate DDE, severe DDE |
Collard 2016 | Cross-sectional observational study | Case 26 Control N/A | < 18 | % of subjects with hypomineralised teeth |
Abu-Zahra 2019 | Cross-sectional study | Case 20 Control N/A | 6–18 | % of subjects with DDE |
Pawlaczyk-Kamieńska 2019 | Cross-sectional study | Case 22 Control 22 | 20–43 | % of subjects with DDE |