Item | Assessment method | Criteria |
---|---|---|
Chewing ability | • Color-changing chewing gum (Masticatory Performance Evaluating Gum XYLITOL, Lotte, Tokyo, Japan) was chewed for 1 min, and the change in color was determined by comparing it to a color chart (range: 1–5). | • Risk: 1, 2 • Normal: 3–5 |
Maximum occlusal pressure | • The sample was collected by biting a pressure-sensitive film (Dental Prescale II, GC Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) with the maximum intercuspal position for 3 s. • The collected films were analyzed using a a dedicated scanner (GT-X830, EPSON, Tokyo, Japan) and software (Bite Force Analyzer, GC Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). | • Risk: < 500 N • Normal: 500 N or higher |
Number of remaining teeth | • Oral examination using a tongue depressor and penlight | • Risk: < 20 • Normal: 20 or more |
Maximum tongue pressure | • Participants were asked to bite a JMS tongue pressure measuring instrument (TPM-02, JMS Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) lightly and use maximum force to bite the balloon between the tongue and roof of the mouth for at least 7 s. • A total of three trials were performed to determine the maximum value. | Criteria for 60–69 years old • Risk: ≤ 30 kPa • Normal: greater than 30 kPa Criteria for Over 70 years old • Risk: ≤ 20 kPa • Normal: greater than 20 kPa |
Oral dryness | • With the participants’ tongues out, an oral moisture checking device (Mucus, Life Co., Saitama, Japan) was placed perpendicular to the mucosa to measure it with a force of 200 g for 2 s. • The average value of three consecutive measurements was used. | • Risk: < 27.0 • Normal: 27.0 or higher |
Oral cleanliness | • Score for the oral cleanliness item on the Oral Health Assessment Tool (0: Clean and no food particles or tartar in the mouth or dentures; 1: Food particles, tartar, or plaque in one to two areas of the mouth or small area of dentures or halitosis (bad breath); 2: Food particles, tartar, or plaque in most areas of the mouth or dentures or severe halitosis (bad breath) | • Risk: 2 • Caution: 1 • Normal: 0 |