From: Association between dental age and malocclusions: a systematic review
Study ID | Criteria for DA evaluation | Malocclusion evaluated (criteria) | N | Mean CA | SD | Mean DA | SD | DA-CA | SD | Description of Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amaral et al., 2019 [14] | Demirjian | Class I (Angle) | 77 | 11.50 | 0.86 | 10.87 | 0.86 | NR | NR | • Patients with Angle Class II, division two malocclusion presented lower DA than patients with Angle Class I malocclusion. |
Angle Class II, 2 (Angle) | 95 | 11.45 | 1.55 | 10.19 | 1.22 | NR | NR | |||
Durka-Zając et al, 2017 [15] | Demirjian | Class I (ANPg = -0.5-4º) | 50 | NR | NR | 9.55 | 1.71 | NR | NR | • Patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion presented the lower DA among the groups. • Patients with skeletal Class III presented a significantly higher DA than patients with skeletal Class II. |
Class II (ANPg >4º) | 50 | NR | NR | 9.51 | 1.31 | NR | NR | |||
Class III (ANPg <-0.5) | 50 | NR | NR | 10.44 | 1.6 | NR | NR | |||
Goncharuk-Khomyn et al., 2020 [42] | Demirjian | Class I (NR) | 23 | NR | NR | NR | NR | 0.49 | 0.35 | • No significant difference in DA was found among the groups. |
Class II (NR) | 19 | NR | NR | NR | NR | 0.37 | 0.69 | |||
Class III (NR) | 19 | NR | NR | NR | NR | 0.64 | 0.47 | |||
Sukhia and Fida, 2010 [37] | Demirjian | Class I (ANB=0-4º) | 132 | NR | NR | 13.03 | 2.29 | NR | NR | • No significant difference in DA was found among the groups. |
Class II (ANB>4º) | 132 | NR | NR | 12.86 | 2.16 | NR | NR |