From: Association between dental age and malocclusions: a systematic review
Study ID | Country | Age of paticipants [mean±SD] | Total number of participants | % of male paticipants | Setting of recruitment | Groups (n) | NOS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | C | O | Total | |||||||
Akturk et al, 2021 [39] | Turkey | NR | 80 | 32.5% | University | Dental Class I (42) Dental Classe II (38) | * | * | ** | 4 |
Amaral et al, 2019 [14] | Brazil | 8 to 12 [NR] | 200 | 45.0% | Schools | Dental Class I (100) Dental Class II (100) | ** | * | ** | 5 |
Brin et al, 2006 [43] | Israel and Turkey | 7 to 17 [11.3] | 221 | 41.6% | Orthodontic clinic | Skeletal Class I (41) Maxillary class II (68) Mandibular class II (112) | * | * | ** | 4 |
Celikoglu et al, 2011 [13] | Turkey | 9 to 15 [12.51] | 525 | 48.8% | University | Skeletal Class I (162) Skeletal Class II (186) Skeletal Class III (177) | **** | * | * | 6 |
Durka-Zając et al, 2017 [15] | Poland | 9 to 12 [9.83] | 150 | 50.0% | Orthodontic clinic | Skeletal Class I (50) Skeletal Class II (50) Skeletal Class III (50) | * | * | * | 3 |
Esenlik, Atak and Altun, 2014 [31] | Turkey | 7 to 15 [NR] | 321 | 48.6% | University | Skeletal Class I (107) Skeletal Class II (152) Skeletal Class III (62) | *** | ** | ** | 7 |
Goncharuk-Khomyn et al, 2020 [42] | Ukraine | 15 to 17 [NR] | 61 | NR | University | Class I (23) Class II (19) Class III (19) | ** | * | * | 4 |
Gottimukkala et al., 2012 [33] | India | 9 to 12 [NR] | 100 | 50.0% | Private schools | Vertical growth pattern (50) Horizontal growth pattern (50) | * | * | * | 3 |
Goyal et al, 2011 [34] | India | 8 to 10 [NR] | 150 | 50.0% | University | Normal growth pattern (50) Vertical growth pattern (50) Horizontal growth pattern (50) | ** | * | * | 4 |
Haruki, Kanomi and Shimono, 1997 [40] | Japan | NR | 53 | 43.4% | Orthodontic clinic | Dental Class II (27) Dental Class III (26) | ** | ** | 4 | |
Jamroz et al, 2006 [41] | Netherlands | 9 to 12 [11.3±1] | 176 | NR | University | Vertical growth pattern (107) Horizontal growth pattern (69) | *** | * | ** | 6 |
Janson et al., 1998 [16] | Brazil | 7 to 10 [9] | 40 | 50.0% | University | Vertical growth pattern (20) Horizontal growth pattern (20) | * | * | ** | 4 |
Jeong and Yang, 1996 [38] | South Korea | 8 to 13 [10] | 333 | 50.8% | University | Dental Class I (182) Dental Class III (151) | * | ** | * | 4 |
Jo et al., 2021 [5] | South Korea | 8 to 14 [NR] | 184 | 52.2% | University | Normal growth pattern (93) Vertical growth pattern (49) Horizontal growth pattern (42) | *** | * | ** | 6 |
Kamble et al., 2014 [35] | India | 8 to 14 [NR] | 60 | NR | NR | Normal growth pattern (20) Vertical growth pattern (20) Horizontal growth pattern (20) | * | 1 | ||
Lauc et al., 2017 [6] | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 7 to 15 [NR] | 776 | 47.4% | University | Skeletal Class I (284) Skeletal Class II (218) Skeletal Class III (274) | *** | * | ** | 6 |
Mahmood and Fida, 2018 [36] | Pakistan | 9 to 16 [NR] | 270 | 50.0% | University | Dental Class I (100) Dental Class II (100) Dental Class III (70) | *** | ** | * | 6 |
Neves et al, 2005 [30] | Brazil | 8 to 8.92 [NR] | 60 | 50.0% | University | Vertical growth pattern (30) Horizontal growth pattern (30) | *** | * | ** | 6 |
Sukhia and Fida, 2010 [37] | Pakistan | 7 to 17 [NR] | 264 | 42.0% | University | Normal growth pattern (88) Vertical growth pattern (88) Horizontal growth pattern (88) Skeletal Class I (132) Skeletal Class II (132) | **** | * | ** | 7 |
Uysal, Yagci and Ramoglu, 2005 [32] | Turkey | 8 to 13 [10.90±1.62] | 101 | 52.5% | University | Dental Class I (50) Unilateral posterior crossbite (51) | * | ** | ** | 5 |