Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression of oral health service utilization performed in the past 12 months

From: Factors associated with oral health service utilization among young people in southern China

Variables

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

Predisposing factors

   

Gender (male)

0.72(0.49, 1.05)

0.72(0.484, 1.06)

0.75(0.49, 1.12)

Mother’s education (Low)

   

 Medium

1.13 (0.74, 1.73)

0.93(0.60, 1.45)

0.89(0.56, 1.40)

 High

1.29 (0.81, 2.04)

0.83(0.48, 1.42)

0.78(0.44, 1.36)

Beliefs

   

 Knowledge, attitude and belief score > 8 (≤ 8)

2.21(1.27, 4.03)**

2.04(1.16, 3.73)*

1.84(1.02, 3.43)*

Frequent dessert and candy consumption (< 2/day)

1.58(1.04, 2.40) *

1.52(0.99, 2.34)

1.44(0.94, 2.25)

Frequent sugary drinks consumption (< 2/day)

3.02(2.02, 4.55)***

2.93(1.95, 4.45)***

2.90(1.90, 4.47)***

Frequent sweetened coffee or milk consumption (< 2/day)

0.72(0.48, 1.07)

0.73(0.48, 1.10)

0.73(0.47, 1.11)

Brushing frequency ≥ 2 /day (< 2/day)

2.38(1.46, 4.01)***

2.41(1.46, 4.09)***

2.09(1.24, 3.61)**

Brushing duration ≥ 1 min (< 1 min)

1.25(0.63, 2.63)

1.31(0.64, 2.81)

1.15(0.55, 2.53)

Frequent flossing using (No)

3.02(1.50, 6.14)**

3.22(1.54, 6.82)**

2.63(1.21, 5.76)*

Use of fluoride toothpaste (No)

0.88(0.60, 1.30)

0.89(0.60, 1.32)

0.81(0.54, 1.22)

Enabling Factors

   

Rural (Urban)

 

0.53(0.35, 0.81)**

0.52(0.34, 0.80)**

Living costs (No)

   

 Medium

 

1.67(0.96, 2.96)

1.60(0.92, 2.86)

 High

 

1.66(0.84, 3.33)

1.53(0.76, 3.15)

Only-child (No)

 

1.20(0.72, 1.99)

1.14(0.67, 1.93)

Need factors

   

Oral health status (good)

   

 Fair

  

0.92(0.60, 1.41)

 Poor

  

0.64(0.34, 1.21)

Caries (No)

  

2.07(1.35, 3.17)***

Concern for the oral health (very concern)

   

 Fair

  

0.48(0.31, 0.74)***

 No

  

0.26(0.08, 0.67)**

  1. Model 1: The predisposing factors were included in the logistic model for analysis
  2. Model 2: The predisposing factors and enabling factors were included in the logistic model for analysis
  3. Model 3: All variables were included in the logistic model analysis
  4. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001