Skip to main content

Table 3 Article evaluation according to SURGE criteria: Results, discussion, and ethics

From: Quality of survey-based study reports in dentistry

Section

Description of the criterion

Categories

n

Results

It reports the response rate.

1. Yes, defined

57

2. Yes, not defined

14

3. Partial information

4

4. No information

24

It takes into account all respondents.

1. Yes

86

2. No

13

Information on how nonrespondents differ from respondents.

1. Yes

5

2. Subject addressed

2

3. No information

92

Results are clearly presented.

1. Yes, complete

97

2. Yes, partial

2

3. No

0

Results reflect the objectives of the study.

1. Yes

99

2. No

0

Discussion

Summary results in relation to the objectives of the study.

1. Yes

99

2. No

0

It mentions the strengths of the study.

1. Yes

53

2. No

46

It indicates the limitations of the study.

1. Yes

90

2. No

9

There is an explicit discussion of the generalization of results.

1. Yes

65

2. No

34

Ethical quality indicators

Report on the financing of the study.

1. Yes

42

2. No

57

Review of the study by a Research Ethics Committee.

1. Yes

86

2. Reported exempted from a committee

13

3. No

0

Report on procedures for individuals’ consent

1. Yes

69

2. Reported refused informed consent

3

3. No

27