Section | Description of the criterion | Categories | n |
---|---|---|---|
Results | It reports the response rate. | 1. Yes, defined | 57 |
2. Yes, not defined | 14 | ||
3. Partial information | 4 | ||
4. No information | 24 | ||
It takes into account all respondents. | 1. Yes | 86 | |
2. No | 13 | ||
Information on how nonrespondents differ from respondents. | 1. Yes | 5 | |
2. Subject addressed | 2 | ||
3. No information | 92 | ||
Results are clearly presented. | 1. Yes, complete | 97 | |
2. Yes, partial | 2 | ||
3. No | 0 | ||
Results reflect the objectives of the study. | 1. Yes | 99 | |
2. No | 0 | ||
Discussion | Summary results in relation to the objectives of the study. | 1. Yes | 99 |
2. No | 0 | ||
It mentions the strengths of the study. | 1. Yes | 53 | |
2. No | 46 | ||
It indicates the limitations of the study. | 1. Yes | 90 | |
2. No | 9 | ||
There is an explicit discussion of the generalization of results. | 1. Yes | 65 | |
2. No | 34 | ||
Ethical quality indicators | Report on the financing of the study. | 1. Yes | 42 |
2. No | 57 | ||
Review of the study by a Research Ethics Committee. | 1. Yes | 86 | |
2. Reported exempted from a committee | 13 | ||
3. No | 0 | ||
Report on procedures for individuals’ consent | 1. Yes | 69 | |
2. Reported refused informed consent | 3 | ||
3. No | 27 |