Skip to main content

Table 4 Frequency distribution of root canal configurations in distal root for 733 two-rooted mandibular second molars

From: Variations of root and canal morphology of mandibular second molars in Chinese individuals: a cone-beam computed tomography study

Canal configuration N (%)

Gender

Age

Total of all

Female

(n = 321)

Male

(n = 412)

15–24

(n = 232)

25–34

(n = 146)

35–44

(n = 116)

45–54

(n = 152)

≥ 55

(n = 87)

733

Type I, oval canala

138 (42.9)

187 (45.3)

66 (28.4)§

51 (34.9)§

52 (44.8)§

95 (62.5)§

61 (70.1)§

325 (44.3)

Type I, flat canalb

87 (27.1)

135 (32.7)

104(44.8)§§

49 (33.5)§§

36 (31.0)§§

27 (17.7)§§

6 (6.89)§§

222 (30.3)

Type I, expand canalc

79 (24.6)

75 (18.2)

52 (22.4)

39 (26.7)

22 (18.9)

26 (17.1)

15 (17.2)

154 (21)

Type I, Total

304(94.7)

397 (96.3)

222(95.6)

139(95.2)

110(94.8)

148(97.3)

82(94.2)

701 (95.6)

Type II, 2–1 canal

-

5 (1.21)

-

4 (2.73)

-

1 (0.65)

-

5 (0.68)

Type III,1–2-1 cnal

7 (2.18)

5 (1.21)

5 (2.15)

-

4 (3.44)

-

3 (3.44)

12 (1.6)

Type V,1–2 canal

10 (3.11)

5 (1.21)

5 (2.15)

3 (2.1)

2 (1.72)

3 (1.97)

2 (2.29)

15 (2)

  1. aA small and narrow canal
  2. bA large and wide canal
  3. cThe middle part of the canal is expanded
  4. By chi-square test: §P = 0.000; §§P = 0.000