Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical evaluation of the sealants according to anatomic form, marginal adaptation, surface texture, marginal discoloration and secondary caries

From: Clinical evaluation of giomer- and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent molars affected by molar-incisor hypomineralization: a randomized clinical trial

Category

Score

Follow-up

1-Month

3-Month

6-Month

12-Month

Group 1

(Conceal F)

No. of teeth

Group 2

(BS)

No. of teeth

Group 1

(Conceal F)

No. of teeth

Group 2

(BS)

No. of teeth

Group 1

(Conceal F)

No. of teeth

Group 2

(BS)

No. of teeth

Group 1

(Conseal F)

No. of teeth

Group 2

(BS)

No. of teeth

Anatomic Form

Alpha

42

12

31

6

27

3

23

1

Bravo

7

11

14

7

13

8

11

3

Charlie

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Marginal Adaptation

Alpha

41

12

30

5

26

2

22

0

Bravo

8

11

15

8

14

9

12

4

Charlie

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Surface Texture

Alpha

48

19

41

11

35

9

31

1

Bravo

1

4

4

2

5

2

3

3

Charlie

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Marginal Discoloration

Alpha

49

23

45

13

39

10

33

3

Bravo

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

Charlie

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Secondary Caries

Alpha

49

23

45

13

40

11

34

4

Charlie

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total number of teeth evaluated*

49

23

45

13

40

11

34

4

  1. *If the loss of sealant was determined at the follow-up (retention score = charlie), the restoration could not be evaluated in terms of the other USPHS criteria