Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of each included Economic Evaluation

From: A systematic review of the quality and scope of decision modelling studies in child oral health research

Author

Type of economic evaluation

Model design

Perspective

Horizon

Costing data details

Model input and parameter details

Data sources

Outcome measure

Broden et al. [1]

CEA

Cohort simulation Markov

Care provider

9 years

Swedish Board for Dental Benefits

Systematic review; Swedish Social Insurance Agency during 2009, with a follow-up of 5; Statistics Sweden (mortality)

Secondary data

Extracted tooth or death of patient

Elhennawy et al. [2]

CEA

Individual patient-level microsimulation Markov

Mixed public–private-payer

Lifetime

German public and private dental fee catalogues (BEMA and GOZ)

Combination of systematic reviews and primary studies

Primary & secondary data

Tooth retention years

Schwendicke et al. [3]

CEA

Individual patient-level microsimulation Markov

Mixed public–private-payer

63.5 years

Fee catalogues for the statutory public insurance & private dental catalogue GKV-Spitzenverband, 2013; KZBV, 2013

Combination of systematic reviews and primary studies

Primary & secondary data

Retention time/length of time remained vital

Schwendicke et al. [4]

CEA

Individual patient-level microsimulation Markov

Mixed public–private-payer

Lifetime

German public and private dental fee catalogues (BEMA and GOZ)

Combination of systematic reviews and primary studies

Primary & secondary data

Tooth retention years

Schwendicke et al. [5]

CEA

Individual patient-level microsimulation Markov

Mixed public–private-payer

Lifetime

German public and private dental fee catalogues (BEMA and GOZ)

Combination of systematic reviews and primary studies

Primary & secondary data

Tooth retention years

Schwendicke et al. [6]

CEA

Not stated

Public-payer perspective (public insurance system)

10 years

German public fee catalogue (BEMA)

Longitudinal and cohort studies

Primary & secondary data

Caries increment; net revenue

Schwendicke et al. [7]

CEA

Not stated

Mixed public–private-payer

Lifetime

German public and private dental fee catalogues (BEMA and GOZ)

Combination of systematic reviews and primary studies

Primary & secondary data

Tooth retention years

Schwendicke et al. [8]

CEA

Individual patient-level microsimulation Markov

Mixed public–private-payer

Lifetime

German public and private dental fee catalogues (BEMA and GOZ)

Combination of systematic reviews and primary studies

Primary & secondary data

Caries increment in DMFT; tooth retention years (secondary)

Splieth et al. [9]

Cost–cost analysis

System dynamics model

Unclear

Lifetime of cohort

German national health system

Effects of fluoride use over time and caries risk (based on local figures); combination of systematic reviews and primary studies

Primary & secondary data

Caries reduction; costs (lifetime, annual)

  1. CEA cost effectiveness analysis