Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution of Indonesian dentistry students’ perspective regarding TCC

From: Intention to provide tobacco cessation counseling among Indonesian dental students and association with the theory of planned behavior

 

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Dont consider TCC part of the dentist’s role

23 (1.8%)

83 (6.4%)

276 (21.4%)

669 (51.9%)

237 (18.4%)

Many patients are not motivation to quit

290 (22.5%)

608 (47.2%)

230 (17.9%)

123 (9.5%)

37 (2.9%)

TCC ineffective with no health problems

203 (15.8%)

495 (38.4%)

317 (24.6%)

217 (16.8%)

56 (4.3%)

Clinical time is limited for TCC

94 (7.3%)

307 (23.8%)

469 (36.4%)

355 (27.6%)

63 (4.9%)

No referral pathway for smoking patients

72 (5.6%)

312 (24.2%)

527 (40.9%)

298 (23.1%)

79 (6.1%)

Patients dont listen to dental students’ TCC

43 (3.3%)

260 (20.2%)

566 (43.9%)

349 (27.1%)

70 (5.4%)

Patients dont expect TCC from students

40 (3.1%)

256 (19.9%)

546 (42.4%)

374 (29.0%)

72 (5.6%)

Assesing smoking history is intrusive

25 (1.9%)

233 (18.1%)

580 (45.0%)

386 (30.0%)

64 (5.0%)

TCC upsets dentist-patient relationship

35 (2.7%)

243 (18.9%)

384 (29.8%)

499 (38.7%)

127 (9.9%)

TCC alienates patients

29 (2.3%)

184 (14.3%)

416 (32.3%)

514 (39.9%)

145 (11.3%)