From: Economic evaluations in water-fluoridation: a scoping review
Reference | 1. Is there a well defined question? | 2. Is there a comprehensive description of alternatives? | 3. Are all important and relevant costs and outcomes for each alternative identified? | 4. Has clinical effectiveness been established? | 5. Are costs and outcomes measured accurately? | 6. Are costs and outcomes valued credibly? | 7. Are costs and outcomes adjusted for differential timing? | 8. Is there an incremental analysis of costs and consequences? | 9. Were sensitivity analyses conducted to investigate uncertainty in estimates of cost or consequences? | 10. Do study results include all issues of concern to users? | 11. Are the results generalizable to the setting of interest in the review? | Quality Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Davies 1973 [34] | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | Moderate |
Nelson 1976 [42] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Moderate |
Carr 1980 [49] | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Moderate |
Doessel 1985 [35] | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Moderate |
Birch 1986 [30] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Moderate |
Manau 1987 [38] | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | Fair |
Birch 1990 [29] | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Moderate |
MillƔn 1991 [40] | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Fair |
Murgueytio 1995 [41] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | Moderate |
Arjunan 2000 [50] | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Moderate |
Griffin 2001 [36] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Moderate |
Wright 2001 [46] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Moderate |
OāConnell 2005 [44] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Moderate |
Campain 2010 [31] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good |
Ciketic 2010 [32] | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Moderate |
Cobiac 2012 [33] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good |
Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Moderate | |
Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good | |
Tchouaket 2013 [45] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good |
Edelstein 2015 [51] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Fair |
Fyfe 2015 [47] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good |
Atkins 2016 [52] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Good |
OāConnell 2016 [43] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good |
Moore 2017 [48] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Good |