Skip to main content

Table 2 Reasons for preferred treatment

From: Treatment decisions regarding caries and dental developmental defects in children - a questionnaire-based study among Norwegian dentists

Treatment option

Reasons for preferred treatment

n (%)

Total

Case 1a

 RMGIC (58.3%)

Patient cooperation

182 (56.7)

321

Prognosis of the tooth

100 (31.2)

 

Experience

25 (7.8)

 

 GIC (17.9%)

Patient cooperation

52 (52.5)

99

Prognosis of the tooth

34 (34.3)

 

Experience

7 (7.1)

 

 ZOE (13.2%)

Patient cooperation

38 (53.5)

71

Prognosis of the tooth

25 (35.2)

 

Experience

8 (11.3)

 

 RC (8.7%)

Patient cooperation

24 (52.2)

46

Prognosis of the tooth

17 (37.0)

 

Experience

3 (6.5)

 

 Extraction (0.9%)

Aesthetics

3 (60.0)

5

Patient cooperation/prognosis of the tooth

2 (40.0)

 

 PAMRC (0.7%)

Prognosis of the tooth

4 (100.0)

4

 SSC (0.4%)

Patient cooperation/number of affected molars

2 (100.0)

2

Case 1b

 RMGIC (37.1%)

Prognosis of the tooth

147 (78.6)

187

Experience

22 (11.8)

 

Time available

7 (3.7)

 

 RC (17.6%)

Prognosis of the tooth

66 (72.5)

91

Experience

14 (15.4)

 

Number of affected molars

7 (7.7)

 

 GIC (17.2%)

Prognosis of the tooth

59 (67.0)

88

Experience

11 (12.5)

 

Number of affected molars

9 (10.2)

 

 Extraction (15.1%)

Prognosis of the tooth

62 (80.5)

77

Experience

10 (13.0)

 

Number of affected molars

2 (2.6)

 

 SSC (7.2%)

Prognosis of the tooth

19 (51.4)

37

Experience

8 (21.6)

 

Material longevity

5 (13.5)

 

 ZOE (5.1%)

Prognosis of the tooth

19 (70.4)

27

Experience

5 (18.5)

 

Number of affected molars/materials available/aesthetics

3 (11.1)

 

 PAMRC (0.8%)

Prognosis of the tooth

2 (50.0)

4

Materials available/experience

2 (50.0)

 

Case 2

 RC (38.4%)

Patient cooperation

81 (44.0)

184

Prognosis of the tooth

81 (44.0)

 

Experience

18 (10.0)

 

 RMGIC (26.6%)

Prognosis of the tooth

57 (44.9)

127

Patient cooperation

49 (38.6)

 

Experience

12 (9.4)

 

 GIC (19.0%)

Prognosis of the tooth

38 (42.0)

91

Patient cooperation

33 (36.3)

 

Experience

15 (16.5)

 

 Extraction (8.7%)

Prognosis of the tooth

29 (69.1)

42

Experience

6 (14.3)

 

Patient cooperation

3 (7.1)

 

 SSC (5.4%)

Prognosis of the tooth

10 (38.5)

26

Patient cooperation

8 (31.0)

 

Number of affected molars

5 (19.2)

 

 ZOE (1.0%)

Patient cooperation/experience

4 (80.0)

5

Number of affected molars

1 (20.0)

 

 PAMRC (1.0%)

Prognosis of the tooth

2 (40.0)

5

Number of affected molars/aesthetics/patient cooperation

3 (60.0)

 
  1. The three highest prioritised reasons for the most preferred choice of treatment in each clinical case (1a, 1b and 2). Different n due to missing values