Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the surveys and samples, 2004–2012

From: Macroeconomic changes and trends in dental care utilization in Estonia and Lithuania in 2004–2012: a repeated cross-sectional study

 

Estonia

Lithuania

n (response rate, %)

n (response rate, %)

Study year

 2004

2781 (63)

1807 (62)

 2006

2585 (59)

1739 (59)

 2008

2758 (62)

1731 (61)

 2010

2842 (62)

1972 (54)

 2012

2784 (62)

1785 (52)

Characteristics of the samples (%)a

 

(n = 13,750)

(n = 9034)

Gender

 Men

41 (43, 42, 42)

41 (43, 42, 40)

 Women

59 (57, 58, 58)

59 (57, 58, 60)

Age

 20–34

33 (33, 33, 30)

30 (31, 29, 27)

 35–49

33 (33, 34, 32)

37 (38, 39, 37)

 50–64

35 (33, 33, 37)

33 (31, 32, 36)

Ethnicity

 Main

70 (68, 69, 72)

87 (86, 87, 87)

 Other

31 (32, 31, 28)

13 (14, 12, 13)

 Missing

  0 (0, 0, 0)

  1 (1, 1, 0)

Education

 High

25 (19, 26, 29)

26 (24, 29, 27)

 Mid

62 (65, 62, 60)

64 (63, 64, 65)

 Low

13 (15, 12, 11)

10 (13, 7, 8)

 Missing

  0 (1, 1, 0)

  0 (0, 0, 1)

Economic activity

 Employed

72 (72, 77, 70)

75 (72, 80, 74)

 Non-employed

27 (27, 23, 28)

24 (27, 19, 25)

 Missing

  1 (1, 1, 2)

  1 (1, 1, 2)

Dental visits

 Yes

49 (46, 53, 49)

64 (62, 68, 65)

 No

51 (54, 47, 51)

36 (38, 32, 35)

Toothache

 Yes

15 (17, 13, 14)

13 (13, 12, 14)

 No

84 (82, 85, 84)

87 (87, 88, 87)

 Missing

  2 (1, 2, 2)

  0 (0, 0, 0)

Missing teeth

 No

22 (18, 25, 23)

19 (16, 21, 20)

 1–5

47 (48, 48, 47)

48 (48, 47, 47)

  > 6

30 (33, 27, 30)

32 (34, 29, 32)

 Missing

  1 (1, 1, 0)

  2 (2, 3, 1)

  1. aAverage proportion for 2004–2012 and point estimates for 2004, 2008 and 2012