Skip to main content

Table 2 A set of logistic regression models c,d to predict infant’s high frequency of free sugars intakea

From: Inequalities in the frequency of free sugars intake among Syrian 1-year-old infants: a cross-sectional study

Variable

Adjusted OR (95 % CI)e

 

Model 1c

Model 2c

Model 3c

Model 4d

Father’s occupation

 Professional

1

1

1

1

 Manual

0.7 (0.4–1.3)

0.7 (0.4–1.2)

0.7 (0.4–1.3)

0.7 (0.4–1.3)

 Not working

3.1 (1.1–8.5)b

2.6 (0.9–7.3)

1.5 (0.5–4.8)

1.4 (0.4–4.4)

Mother’s knowledge about infant’s oral health behaviourf

 High

 

1

1

1

 Low

 

1.9 (1.2–3.1)b

1.8 (1.1–3)b

1.8 (1.1–3)b

Mother’s frequency of free sugars intakeg

 Low

  

1

1

 High

  

3.2 (1.4–7.4)b

3.2 (1.4–7.4)b

  1. an = 323
  2. bP < 0.050
  3. cModel 1, 2 and 3 adjusted for mother’s age, infant’s gender and family size
  4. dModel 4 additionally adjusted for centre’s level of deprivation
  5. eOR (95 % CI): odds ratios (95 % confidence intervals)
  6. fMeasured by 17 items developed by the current study, based on the British evidence-based guidelines for prevention of caries in children aged 0–3 years [2]. High level refers to scores equal to or higher than the median, whereas low level refers to scores below the median
  7. gHigh level refers to >4 times a day, whereas low level refers to 4 times or less a day