Skip to main content

Concomitant bilateral mandibular cemento-ossifying fibroma and cementoblastoma: case report of an extremely rare occurrence



Cemento-ossifying fibroma (COF) and cementoblastoma (CB) are rare benign odontogenic tumors with a predilection for the mandible. Cemento-ossifying fibroma is a fibro-osseous lesion that originates in the tooth bearing areas of jaw and shows cementum-like tissue in a fibrotic stroma. Cementoblastoma is classically related to roots of teeth with the presence of calcified cementum-like material. To date, only a single case of concomitant unilateral COF and CB has been reported in the literature.

Case presentation

We present an unusual case of a 37-year-old female who presented with two discrete bilateral swellings in the right and left mandible for 10 years. The larger tumor involved the left posterior mandible with extension anteriorly to the left and right anterior mandibles, and the smaller tumor was present in right posterior mandible. Radiology revealed two distinct lesions involving both sides of mandible. Histopathological examination showed characteristic features of cemento-ossifying fibroma in sections of the larger tumor and cementoblastoma in sections of smaller tumor.


This case shows the very unique bilateral co-existence of COF and CB, the second case reported in literature to date.

Peer Review reports


Cemento-ossifying fibroma (COF) and Cementoblastoma (CB) are two distinct benign tumors of odontogenic origin [1]. Both of these tumors are slow-growing and show affinity for premolar and molar regions of the mandible, followed by the maxilla [2]. COF displays painless expansion of cortical plates of the affected bone, whereas CB presents with sharp toothache-like pain [3]. The incidence of COF peaks in third to fourth decades of life with a female predominance. In contrast, CB has a wide age range with no significant gender disparity [4]. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice. COF can be managed with conservative excision, and recurrence is rare [5]. CB frequently recurs after incomplete excision [6]. Untreated cases of both tumors can show massive enlargement, which may require en-bloc resection [7, 8]. To date, only a single case of concomitant COF and CB has been reported in the literature. Here we present the case of a 37-year-old female who presented with the unique co-existence of concomitant bilateral COF and CB. The patient underwent surgical excision of both lesions.

Case presentation

A 37-year-old female presented with bilateral mandibular swellings with associated progressive facial asymmetry for 10 years. The swellings gradually increased in size expanding the buccal cortex. She had mild difficulty in mouth opening while movement of temporomandibular joints was normal. The patient developed pain on the posterior aspect of right mandible for one and a half years which became intense with time. There was no history of trauma. Clinical examination revealed a well-demarcated expansile bony swelling in the left lower tooth bearing region extending from the left second premolar to right mandibular canine anteriorly. The swelling was firm and tender with pinkish appearance of mucosa. A clinical diagnosis of ossifying fibroma was considered. Another well-defined painful swelling was present in right posterior premolar area. Orthopantomogram revealed a 7 × 5.5 cm well-defined, expansive radiolucent mass with scattered radiodense calcified areas involving the roots of the first and second left premolars, right and left canines, and right and left central and lateral incisors. The right posterior mandible area showed a 2.5 × 2 cm well-defined radiopaque swelling distorting roots of the second and third molars. There was a visible thin peripheral radiolucent zone surrounding the radiodense area resulting in obliteration and deviation of the roots (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Orthopantomogram showing a well-delineated radiopaque lesion associated with the roots of the right mandibular second and third molars demolishing radiographical details of the roots. Another well-defined radiolucency with focal radiodense areas is visible in the left lower mandible involving roots of the left lower teeth extending till the right canine

The patient underwent complete surgical excision with piecemeal resection of both lesions at a peripheral hospital, and the two specimens were sent to our center for processing and primary diagnosis. The larger specimen was labelled as “Left mandibular swelling” and the smaller was labelled as “Right mandibular growth”. The larger specimen contained two grey white soft to firm, multinodular tissue pieces, that measured 7 × 5.5 × 2.5 cm in aggregate. The cut surface was tan-white, lobulated and gritty. The smaller was comprised of three bony hard, tan-white tissue pieces that collectively measured 2.5 × 2 cm.

Microscopy of the larger specimen demonstrated a fibro-osseous lesion composed of hypercellular fibroblastic stroma with scattered calcified structures. The stromal cells had hyperchromatic nuclei and moderate eosinophilic cytoplasm. No significant atypia or mitosis was present. The calcified material was comprised of variable proportion of basophilic cementum-like tissue and osteoid bone. Curvilinear woven and lamellar bony trabeculae rimmed by osteoblasts were seen (Fig. 2A, B). Histological examination of the smaller specimen revealed a lesion composed of interconnecting thick trabeculae of cementum-like material rimmed by plump cementoblasts in a loose fibrovascular stroma. There was no atypia or pleomorphism (Fig. 3A, B).

Fig. 2

A, B Fibroosseous proliferation in COF. The osseous component is composed of acellular smoothly outlined rounded structures resembling cementum and present in a bland cellular fibrous stroma (H&E, 40 and ×100 magnification)

Fig. 3

A Irregular deposits of woven bone like material with intervening loose fibrovascular stroma and rimming of cementoblasts. B Periphery of tumor shows characteristic radiating trabeculae of cementum and parallel cementoblasts (H&E, 40 and ×100 magnification)

Based on all these features, the larger specimen was diagnosed as COF and the smaller specimen as CB. Additional surgical intervention was not required, and it took six months for the patient to regain complete jaw movements. No adjuvant therapy was given. Recurrence was not observed after a follow up of three years. The patient’s consent was obtained for publication. Ethic Review Committee (ERC) exemption was not sought as patient identification was not disclosed in the manuscript.

Discussion and conclusions

COF and CB are classified as benign mesenchymal odontogenic tumors according to the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Head and Neck Tumors [9]. COF is a benign fibro-osseous neoplasm that arises exclusively in the tooth-bearing areas of mandible and maxilla with high affinity for the mandibular premolar and molar area [10]. It is linked to dysregulation of particular micro-RNAs [11]. It typically presents as a painless slow-growing enlargement of the lingual and buccal bony plates. Radiology exhibits a well-demarcated lesion that displays radiolucent and variable radiopaque areas dependent on the duration of lesion. Histologically, COF is an encapsulated lesion comprising of calcified structures in a hypercellular fibrous stroma [12]. The calcified structures are composed of variable amounts of osteoid or bone and basophilic cementum-like tissue. Lesions may demonstrate the presence of curvilinear woven and lamellar bony trabeculae rimmed by osteoblasts. The stromal cells possess hyperchromatic nuclei without significant atypia or mitosis. Conservative surgical excision is curative [13]. Recurrence is extremely low with no sarcomatous transformation reported to date [5, 7].

CB is a benign odontogenic tumor related to the roots of teeth with a predilection for mandibular molars and premolars. It is a rare slow-growing painful lesion of cementum origin that expands the buccal and palatal plates of the involved bone [14]. In this case, the patient had pain in the right posterior side of mandible for more than a year that became sharp with time. Radiology depicts a well-defined radiopaque mass fused with the root of the affected tooth. A characteristic peripheral radiolucent halo is present. Histologically, CB shows thick trabeculae of calcified cementum-like tissue [15]. The cementum appears basophilic with irregular reversal lines mimicking Paget disease of bone. The trabeculae are lined by plump cementoblasts in a loose fibrovascular stroma which may contain occasional osteoclast-like cells. The periphery of the tumor displays uncalcified matrix rimmed with cementoblasts in a radiating pattern. Resection with the affected tooth remains the treatment of choice since the lesion has tendency to recur owing to its unlimited growth potential [16]. In this case, the tooth was not removed but fortunately, there was no recurrence, consistent with reports of similar favorable outcomes of conservative excision [17].

It is very important to diagnose both tumors correctly given the consequential outcomes of these tumors and their histologic mimics. COF most closely resembles ossifying fibroma. Although ossifying fibroma is a benign fibro-osseous lesion of jaw, it still causes progressive and sometimes swift expansion of the involved bone and carries a higher likelihood of recurrence [18]. CB also needs to be clearly distinguished from osteoblastoma and osteosarcoma, two bone forming neoplasms affecting the jaw. The former is categorized as an intermediate tumor with locally aggressive behavior, whereas the latter is a malignant osteoid producing tumor. Osteoblastoma and CB share similar histologic features; however, these entities may be distinguished by the connection of CB to the root of tooth and usual absence of blue-bone common in osteoblastoma [19]. Osteosarcoma also requires definite distinction from CB. The cementoblasts in CB may exhibit a plump appearance with pleomorphism and hyperchromasia seen in osteoblasts of osteosarcoma; however, permeative growth pattern, marked nuclear atypia and frequent mitotic figures are not seen in CB. Radiologic appearances also play a major role in establishing the diagnosis in correlation with histologic findings [20].

COF has been documented to co-exist with other odontogenic tumors including adenomatoid odontogenic tumor, compound odontoma and florid cement-osseous dysplasia [21,22,23]. In comparison, the co-existence of cementoblastoma with other tumors is extremely rare. Nevertheless, the presence of multiple CB in a single patient has been reported [24]. Concomitant occurrence of COF and CB is exceptionally unusual and, to date, only one such case has been reported in the literature [25]. This patient was a 10-year-old girl with both lesions present in right mandible, which contrasts to the bilateral involvement in our case. Also, the size of COF in the reported case was smaller (3 × 4 cm) in comparison to a larger (7 × 5.5 cm) size in our report. The cause of this co-existence is unknown. COF is related to dysfunction of micro-RNAs, and there is a possibility that some cases of CB also share similar genetic dysregulation that may explain the co-existence; however, no syndromic association has been established yet. More insight into this topic is needed since only limited data is available in the literature.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials of this work are available from the corresponding author on request.



World Health Organization


Cemento-ossifying fibroma




Ethical Review Committee


  1. 1.

    Wright JM, Tekkesin MS. Odontogenic tumors: where are we in 2017? J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tekkesin MS, Cakarer S, Aksakallı N, et al. Odontogenic tumors: a 50-year experience. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;128:e62–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mohan RP, Verma S, Singh U, et al. Cementifying fibroma. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;8:13–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Young N, Rowson JE. Cementifying fibroma of the frontal bone: a case report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45:667–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    El-Mofty SK. Cemento-ossifying fibroma and benign cementoblastoma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1999;16:302–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huber AR, Folk GS. Cementoblastoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3:133–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Eversole LR, Leider AS, Nelson K. Ossifying fibroma: a clinicopathologic study of sixty-four cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;60:505–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jelic JS, Loftus MJ, Miller AS, et al. Benign cementoblastoma: report of an unusual case and analysis of 14 additional cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51:1033–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, et al: WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumors. Lyon, International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2017; 230, 251.

  10. 10.

    Brannon RB, Fowler CB. Benign fibro-osseous lesions: a review of current concepts. Adv Anat Pathol. 2001;8:126–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pereira TD, Brito JA, Guimaraes AL, et al. Micro RNA profiling reveals dysregulated micro RNA s and their target gene regulatory networks in cemento-ossifying fibroma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47:78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bala TK, Soni S, Dayal P, et al. Cemento-ossifying fibroma of the mandible: a clinicopathological report. Saudi Med J. 2017;38:541–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Silva F, Louro R, Cortezzi W, et al. Cemento-ossifying fibroma: prototype guided surgical approach for treatment of major lesions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:242–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chrcanovic BR, Gomez RS. Cementoblastoma: an updated analysis of 258 cases reported in the literature. J Cranio Maxill Surg. 2017;45:1759–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sayd S, Vyloppilli S, Gopinath KA, et al. Cementoblastoma a review of literature. Int Clin Pathol J. 2018;6:97–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    D’Orto B, Busa A, Scavella G, et al. Treatment options in cementoblastoma. J Osseointegr. 2020;12:172–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Borges DC, de Faria PR, Júnior HM, et al. Conservative treatment of a periapical cementoblastoma: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:272–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Owosho AA, Hughes MA, Prasad JL, et al. Psammomatoid and trabecular juvenile ossifying fibroma: two distinct radiologic entities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118(6):732–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Masthan KM, Babu NA, Rajesh E, et al. Cementoblastoma: a review. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2020;14(7):1425–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Van der Waal I. Professional diagnostic delay in osteosarcomas of the jaws. Med Oral Patol Oral Circ Bucal. 2020;25(6):e834–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Prakash AR, Reddy PS, Bavle RM. Concomitant occurrence of cemento-ossifying fibroma and adenomatoid odontogenic tumor with bilateral impacted permanent canines in the mandible. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23:434–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bakhtiari S, Mashhadi AF, Mohajerani SH, et al. Coincidence of compound odontoma and cemento ossifying fibroma; a rare case report. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci. 2016;34:123–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gerlach RC, Dixon DR, Goksel T, et al. Case presentation of florid cemento-osseous dysplasia with concomitant cemento-ossifying fibroma discovered during implant explantation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115:e44-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Iannaci G, Luise R, Iezzi G, et al. Multiple cementoblastoma: a rare case report. Case Rep Dent. 2013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    He X, Li K, Huang Y, et al. Case report Mandibular cementifying fibroma and cementoblastoma: a case report. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;10:5475–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We are especially thankful to Dr. Karen Fritchie, MD from Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA for her valuable intellectual input in drafting the manuscript.


No financial support was provided for this study.

Author information




MBQ, MUT and NUD performed the histological evaluation and diagnosed the case. MR did literature review and MBQ drafted the manuscript, NUD participated in reviewing and revising the article; JAG did the final review and edited the drafted manuscript as per journal policy and participated with the corresponding author. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamshid Abdul-Ghafar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This is an observational and retrospective study, hence was confirmed that no ethical approval is required. Informed consent was obtained from the patients or close relatives of the patients verbally.

Consent for publication

Informed written consent was obtained from patient for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qureshi, M.B., Tariq, M.U., Abdul-Ghafar, J. et al. Concomitant bilateral mandibular cemento-ossifying fibroma and cementoblastoma: case report of an extremely rare occurrence. BMC Oral Health 21, 437 (2021).

Download citation


  • Cemento-ossifying fibroma
  • Cementoblastoma
  • Concomitant