Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between caries increment and caries risk model categories in longitudinal papers

From: Are standardized caries risk assessment models effective in assessing actual caries status and future caries increment? A systematic review

Authors (year)

Age

Study time (years)

Subjects

Caries increments

Range Mean (Standard Deviation)

    

Cariogram

0–20

21–40

41–60

61–80

81–100

Gao (2013) [36]

C

1

485

dmft

2.67 (2.96)

2.02 (1.71)

1.56 (1.63)

0.77 (1.21)

0.34 (0.88)

Kemparaj (2014) [37]

C

2

200

DMFT

0.54 (1.2)

0.43 (1.32)

0.39 (1.04)

0.34 (0.80)

0.06 (0.09)

    

DMFS

0.79 (1.73)

0.73 (1.55)

0.48 (1.72)

0.39 (1.20)

0.09 (1.12)

Celik (2012) [43]

A

2

100

DMFT

1.23 (0.86)

0.65 (0.81)

0.39 (1.02)

0.08 (0.28)

0 (0)

    

DMFS

1.23 (0.86)

0.9 (0.97)

0.48 (1.6)

0.08 (0.28)

0 (0)

Petersson (2002) [32]

C

2

392

DMFT

1.67 (1.44)

1.46 (2.20)

1.07 (1.36)

0.42 (0.90)

0.23 (0.61)

    

DMFS

2.58 (1.83)

2.62 (4.11)

1.47 (1.81)

0.53 (1.24)

0.27 (0.70)

Petersson (2015) [44]

A

3

982

DFT

1.00 (1.40)

0.84 (0.95)

0.82 (1.18)

0.53 (1.07)

0.24 (0.58)

Petersson (2010a) [40]

C

2

392

DMFS

3.00 (a)

2.70 (a)

1.50 (a)

0.50 (a)

0.20 (a)

    

DFS

1.99 (3.00)

1.7 (1.76)

1.59 (2.55)

0.85 (1.91)

0.29 (0.89)

Petersson (2004)b [34]

C

2

392

DFS

1.30 (a)

1.30 (a)

0.70 (a)

0.30 (a)

0.10 (a)

 

A

5

148

DFS

1.90 (a)

1.00 (a)

1.20 (a)

0.40 (a)

0 (a)

Campus (2012) [35]

C

2

861

DS

1.20 (a)

1.20 (a)

0.10 (a)

0.20 (a)

0.10 (a)

    

Cariogram

0–20

21–40

41–60

61–100

Chang and Kim (2014) [42]

C

1.3

64

DMFT

2.97 (5.2)

1.28 (1.5)

1.36 (2.2)

0.44 (0.7)

    

DMFS

5.81 (11.97)

1.28 (1.5)

3.27 (6.8)

0.44 (0.7)

Petersson (2003) [1]

A

5

 

DMFS

16.21 (15.97)

7.36 (9.34)

7.96 (9.52)

5.23 (6.97)

    

Cariogram

0–25

26–50

51–75

76–100

Twetman (2005) [33]

C

3

64

DFS

8 (10.8)

3.4 (2.6)

2.6 (3.7)

0 (0)

    

Cariogram

0–20

21–80

81–100

Zukanovic (2013) [41]

C

3

70

DMFT

1.80 (1.79)

2.40 (2.36)

1.77 (1.88)

    

DMFS

5.00 (7.07)

4.71 (4.34)

2.54 (2.44)

    

Cariogram

0–40

41–100

Holgerson (2009) [15]

C

5

125

dmfs/DMFS

2.40 (3.2)

0.10 (0.4)

    

Cambra

High

Moderate

Low

Gao (2013) [36]

C

1

485

dmft

1.24 (1.58)

0.27 (0.68)

0.20 (0.76)

Chaffee (2015) [45]

A

1.5

4468

DFT

1.74 (a)

1.16 (a)

1.01 (a)

    

CAT

High

Moderate

Low

Gao (2013) [36]

C

1

485

dmft

0.79 (1.31)

0.08 (0.28)

0 (0)

Zukanovic (2013) [41]

C

3

70

DMFT

2.19 (2.33)

2.60 (1.82)

2.38 (1.92)

    

DMFS

4.54 (4.41)

3.80 (5.81)

3.13 (2.53)

    

NUS-CRA

Very High

High

Moderate

Low

Very Low

Gao (2013) [36]

C

1

485

dmft

2.18 (1.87)

2.10 (1.63)

1.26 (1.38)

0.85 (1.11)

0.17 (0.69)

    

PreViser

High

Moderate

Low

Zukanovic (2013) [41]

C

3

70

DMFT

2.35 (2.27)

1.92 (2.18)

2.18 (2.32)

    

DMFS

5.04 (4.75)

3.08 (2.87)

2.82 (3.19)

  1. A Adults, C Children
  2. (a) indicates that Standard Deviation data were not described in the paper. The decimal places reported are those reported in each paper
  3. Petersson, (2004)b reports the increment for year of observation. Holgerson, (2009) and Petersson, (2010b) were excluded from the table since as no mean data for caries were present. Gao (2015) was excluded from the table as the data are the same as those reported for Gao, (2013)