Skip to main content

Table 2 MIH perception, clinical appearance and prevalence according to study participants

From: Dentists’ perception, knowledge, and clinical management of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study

Question

GDPs

N = 115

N (%)

Paediatric Dentists

N = 41

N (%)

Other Dental Specialists

N = 65

N (%)

X 2

P value

How often do you notice hypomineralised teeth in your practice?

 Never

7

(6.1)

2

(4.9)

5

(7.7)

4.75

0.576

 Weekly basis

28

(24.3)

13

(31.7)

19

(29.2)

  

 Monthly basis

51

(44.4)

20

(48.8)

32

(49.2)

  

 Yearly basis

29

(25.2)

6

(14.6)

9

(13.9)

  

Most frequently notice in your practice?

 White demarcated opacities

42

(36.5)

11

(26.8)

17

(26.2)

2.939

0.816

 Yellow/brown demarcated opacities

60

(52.2)

26

(63.4)

38

(58.5)

  

 Posteruptive enamel breakdown

6

(5.2)

2

(4.9)

4

(6.1)

  

 Never seen

7

(6.1)

2

(4.9)

6

(9.2)

  

How confident in diagnosing MIH teeth?

 Very confident

11

(9.6)

7

(17.1)

3

(4.6)

104.8

0.000*

 Confident

21

(18.2)

32

(78.0)

57

(87.7)

  

 Unconfident

83

(72.2) a

2

(4.9) b

5

(7.7) b

  

Are you aware that MIH differs from fluorosis and hypoplasia?

 Yes

93

(80.9) b

41

(100) a

55

(84.6) b

8.99

0.011*

 No

22

(19.1)

0

 

10

(15.4)

  

Prevalence of MIH might be in your community?

 < 5%

18

(15.7)

2

(4.9)

6

(11.8)

5.587

0.061

 5–10%

36

(31.3)

10

(24.4)

10

(25.3)

  

 10–20%

38

(33.0)

19

(46.3)

29

(38.9)

  

 > 20%

7

(6.1)

2

(4.9)

10

(8.6)

  

 Not sure

16

(13.9)

8

(19.5)

10

(15.4)

  

Would be worthwhile to investigate MIH prevalence?

 Yes

101

(87.8)

39

(95.1)

62

(95.4)

3.90

0.142

 No

14

(12.2)

2

(4.9)

3

(4.6)

  

How frequently do you notice this defect in the second primary molar?

 More frequently

11

(9.6)

0

 

4

(6.2)

21.49

0.001*

 Less frequently

72

(62.6) b

39

(95.1) a

42

(64.6) b

  

 Same as FPM

7

(6.1)

2

(4.9)

1

(1.5)

  

 Do not examine primary molars

25

(21.7)

0

 

18

(27.7)

  
  1. * p < 0.05 = significant difference
  2. a-b values within rows with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) using post hoc test